Published: Apr 01, 2015
Controversy surrounding the death penalty has intensified following Utah’s recent enactment of legislation that would allow convicted capital offenders to be executed by firing squad if lethal injection drugs are unavailable. The bill’s sponsor, Republican Paul Ray, claimed that a firing squad was “probably the most humane way to kill somebody." When signing the bill into law, Republican Governor Gary Herbert stated that finding an alternate method of execution was necessary because of the dearth of lethal injection drugs. Utah joins Tennessee, which authorized the use of the electric chair last year, in returning to formerly obsolete forms of execution.
The three drugs used to execute inmates became scarce after both American and European companies chose to stop supplying the drugs to death penalty states. States with scheduled executions then turned to compounding pharmacies to fill custom orders for the lethal cocktail. However, following the botched execution of Clayton Lockett in Ohio last year and pressure on pharmacies by anti-death penalty advocacy groups, compounding pharmacies have become wary of distributing the drugs.
Texas reportedly scrambled to find a supply of lethal injection drugs before finding an unnamed compounding pharmacy to fill the order. In Georgia, an execution was postponed after authorities become skeptical of the appearance of compounded lethal injection drugs. Ohio has completely run out of the drugs and has delayed all executions until 2016 in order to locate the necessary doses. Oklahoma is now considering the use of nitrogen gas as a method of execution.
It is unlikely the lethal injection drugs will be any easier for death penalty states to procure in the future. Earlier this week, the American Pharmacists Association adopted a policy formally discouraging its 62,000 members from providing lethal injection drugs. The new policy states that participating in executions is "fundamentally contrary to the role of pharmacists as providers of health care." Although the Association’s policies are not legally binding, they provide ethical guidance to practicing pharmacists, pharmaceutical scientists, student pharmacists and pharmacy technicians.
While the American Pharmacists Association’s new policy certainly is honorable, it may have the unintended consequence of leading death penalty states to adopt more barbaric, and potentially less humane, forms of execution as demonstrated by Utah’s enactment of execution by firing squad. Rather than taking a moment to reflect on whether killing a human being for his or her crimes is the most cost-effective method of punishment or the best way to deter future crimes, death penalty states appear to be fervently clinging to capital punishment and dusting off their old forms of execution or creating new ones, no doubt compounding the cost that executions already have on the taxpayer. It seems that as the result of rising public opinion against the death penalty and the scarcity of lethal injection drugs, now may be the perfect time for lawmakers to consider the efficacy of capital punishment and whether their constituents might be better served by abandoning the practice entirely.
Read More:The Return of the Electric Chair, Firing Squad and Gas Chamber
Vault is excited to release a new list highlighting the best small and midsized firms with 150 or fewer attorneys—Vault’s Top 150 Under 150!
As a counterpart to the highly respected and widely utilized Vault Law 100, which primarily showcases the largest law firms in the country, we developed the Top 150 Under 150 as a resource for students and lateral candidates seeking an experience outside of BigLaw. Firms included on Vault’s Top 150 Under 150 list provide associates with the opportunity not only to work at a top law firm, but also to take on substantial responsibility early in their careers, and maybe even to climb the rungs to partnership a little more quickly.
Fortune recently released its list of the 100 Best Companies to Work For, and five Vault firms made Fortune’s list: Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC; Arnold & Porter LLP; Cooley LLP; Perkins Coie LLP; and Alston & Bird LLP. Fortune’s rankings are based on a survey of random employees in which respondents rate criteria related to the quality of their workplace culture such as pay, benefits and workplace programs.
We’re under no illusions that this post is the first to address the question of what makes a “good” junior associate (given that a quick Google search will reveal numerous identical-sounding pieces). What makes this post different is the simplicity of our suggestions that can help you from Day One.
Greetings to all the aspiring entrepreneurs out there. Very recently we spoke about some common habits of the most successful entrepreneurs, and as promised, this time we’re going to tackle some of the biggest challenges new entrepreneurs face, along with effective strategies to overcome them.